ELYUKANO Researches
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Recent Submissions
Item Online corpus of spoken Ilokano language(IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019) Apostol, Franklin R.; Malicdem, Alvin R.There has been a great effort in the collection of different languages in the past years all over the world, and the development of online corpus outside the country brought new possibilities in the Philippines. However, there is a limited resource for the Ilokano Language. This paper introduces the Corpus of Spoken Ilokano Language, an online repository of spoken Ilokano in the Philippines specifically in region 1. The main component of this study is spoken Ilokano. It has been specifically built for natural language processing. It shows the difference of Ilokano language as spoken by Ilokanos in the region. The database consists of 160 speakers, 40 speakers in each province of the region, each speaking about 74 statements. Spoken Ilokano language was audio recorded and transcribed. A web application has been developed making the dataset available online. The corpus was validated to provide a useful resource of data that can be used for automatic speech recognition models.Item Elyucano kenni Ilokano:(University of the Philippines Baguio, 2021-06) Medriano, Jerome Pascua; Fong, Jimmy B.; Lazaga, Junley L.; Telles, Jason Paolo R.; Calinawagan, Elizabeth A.This research study sought to find out the status of the implementation of Iloko Code of La Union in the municipality of Aringay. The researcher focused on the four specific categories, which are aligned with the provisions of the code, namely administrative or public service, tourism sector, business enterprises, and health sector. The data gathered, such as public documents, signages, brochures, interview manuscripts, Facebook posts, and official hymns, were analyzed using the theories of language policy, multilingualism, linguistic landscaping, and language activism. To find out if the municipality is compliant with each of the provisions, a checklist of criteria was crafted. It revealed that out of the 25 provisions under the four categories, only 11 provisions were complied with by the municipality, thus the failure of compliance to the said ordinance. The failure of such can be attributed to the following the disregard of the ordinance by the local government unit (LGU) and the concerned establishments; lack of awareness of the key managers who can help in the proper implementation of the provisions; and the prevalence of pro-forma standardized and government/company-funded monolingual signages among public and private establishments.